Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Freepress.net, Harvard Kennedy school, KingCast and others all support Boston Media Reform.


Here is the freepress.net website. Stay tuned this evening or tomorrow morning for footage of last night's panel discussion at the Charles Hotel. Strengthening the presence of alternative media is the general theme going on here, and I like it. I got a chance to share some of the things I have observed with Capitol Access TV in Concord, NH about how the GOP and Senator Kelly Ayotte have an agenda that is all about suppression of free press. Google KingCast v. Ayotte et al. NH Dist. 2010-CV-501.

Saturday, December 25, 2010

KingCast open letter to Daniel Pearl Freedom of Press Act author Adam Schiff and President Barack Obama regarding Senator Kelly Ayotte Free Press lawsuit; Wikipedia coverup & censorship.

Dear Honorable Statesman Schiff and President Obama:

I am honored to write you and pleased that you share the same commitment to Free Press as I do. The Daniel Pearl Freedom of Press Act is a crucial development on the International landscape, yet it is somewhat ironic that we take basic Free Press principles for granted here in the U.S.. The Democrats have been quite reasonable when it comes to me, as noted in my press picture at the Obama/Deval Patrick rally and at an earlier Deval Patrick rally (watch the video) but there are problems coming from the Republicans and Tea Party people:

Here is an entry I filed on Wikipedia today after some people on Wikipedia seemed unsure as to why it is important that all reporters are granted access to publicly-advertised political rallies that are held on commercial property subject to substantial State and Local licensing and regulation. GOP and Tea Party racists and haters of Free Press cannot selectively deny media access on viewpoint and race-based criteria pursuant to NAACP v. Thompson,  648 F.Supp. 195 D.Md.,(1986), as I noted on this Statewide Public Access television program Capitol Access TV Episode 142Meanwhile, Wikipedia removed this post in an act of outright censorship:
===Free Press===
The Nashua Telegraph is the State's second-largest newspaper according to Wikipedia. The newspaper noted that Christopher King "KingCast.net" was escorted out by the police at a GOP/Joe Arpaio rally after he attempted to interview Kelly Ayotte at a publicly-advertised political rally. Mr. King has sued Friends of Kelly Ayotte, New Hampshire and Nashua GOP and Nashua Police Department for being refused admittance to that event and two other GOP events. The case is before the New Hampshire Federal District Court. Among the legal questions the suit could potentially raise is whether a private gathering that vigorously seeks media coverage can bar or expel some reporters but not others. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/news/887281-196/blogger-sues-ayotte-others-over-access.html
Direct link to Plaintiff's lawsuit in KingCast v. Friends of Kelly Ayotte, GOP and Nashua PD, U.S. Dist. NH 2010-CV-501, and direct links to Plaintiff's Memoranda in Opposition to some rather specious Motions to Dismiss. Videos are embedded in the documents and at the end of the Memoranda hosted on wepapers.

Direct link to Plaintiff's 28 U.S.C. §455 Motion for Disclosure as Defense Counsel Jack Middleton was Judge Landya B. McCafferty's boss and Kelly Ayotte's boss, as a founder of McLane, Graf et al. It is widely believed that this firm, which donated generously to Senator Ayotte in her campaign run, also directly helped Her Honor in her ascension to the Bench that occurred earlier this year. This association was not disclosed to Plaintiff when it certainly should have been, particularly as outgoing Magistrate Judge Muirhead -- himself a McLane, Graf Disciple -- served as a mentor to Judge McCafferty in the transition. That doesn't smell right, but then again neither does the fact that Kelly Ayotte won't disavow any support she receives from online house of hate "Niggermania," who said my case "smells like a nigger," watch the video.

Read these threatening emails from Defense Counsel and my response set them on their tuchii; note that they tried to remove Jack Middleton from the chain but I put him right back in there.

Perhaps these are some of the reasons why U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan's staff is following my Tweets and well they should: This case is headed straight for them. As someone who has worked for the government as an Assistant Attorney General and as someone who has written for and edited large and medium-sized daily and weekly newspapers I will not be denied my Fundamental Right to attend and report, and to gather and to disseminate information just as the Plaintiff's won in NAACP v. Thompson,  648 F.Supp. 195 D.Md.,(1986),

Here are the Defendants' cited cases that don't amount to a hill of beans. They are not on point and wholly irrelevant to the factual and legal backdrop of this case:

For example, on the First Amendment claims Nashua PD cites to State v. Dupuy, 118 N.H. 848 (1978), a case that does not involve political rallies at which some members of the media were allowed but not others. Dupuy was a trespasser at a nuclear power plant -- not a political rally attended by other invited reporters. And Defendant's cited case of Kay v. NH Democratic Party, 821 F.2d  31 (1st Cir. 1987) fails because Kay was attempting to barge in and take a place on the podium, and Plaintiff already agrees that such activity is not supported by law. Again, in the political context the NAACP cases are most instructive, and the same exact holding would be contemplated by  Invisible Empire of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, Maryland Chapter v. Town of Thurmont, MD. 700 F.Supp. 281 (1998).

Lastly, here is the YouTube video relative to the myopic efforts of Wikipedia to eliminate any discussion of Senator Ayotte's stance on Free Press.




Update:
 The wikstupidia tools are at it again. This time it is yet another excuse when someone following the issue (whom I only met last month) who agrees with me attempted to post to the "talk" forums, a place where they put things they hope will go away. They locked this individual out for a whole MONTH because s/he dared to support the KingCast position, and s/he assured me that no zombie programs were used at all, just a concerned citizen trying to post.
Another would-be poster (Fourth Estate) sent me these attempts to edit but the vermin scumbag hypocrite sellouts removed all of this as well. This all begs the question: Who is really running the Internet and who is paying or threatening or influence-peddling wikipedia to bury this issue?
 

Friday, December 24, 2010

KingCast asks, "Where's the Go-to-Hell letter from Friends of Kelly Ayotte, GOP and Nashua PD?"


Well sports fans, remember the original journal entry on this matter from three (3) days ago in which I requested that Defendants follow through with the formal letter they promised, when they said they were going to have the Court spank me for asking about the level of contacts between McLane, Graf and Judge McCafferty? 
Still nothing.

Christopher King

 to gmacdonaldBrianjennifer.parentjack.middleton
show details 12:38 PM (0 minutes ago)


Good Day Counselors:
I reiterate my concerns relative to your promises to forward me a formal letter as to why you believe my Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions is subject to Rule 11, and why you believe you are entitled to Attorney Fees relative to my Demand for Disclosure and my Memoranda in  Opposition to your Motions to Dismiss.
I personally spoke with the case manager yesterday and informed her that I may be inclined to withdraw the Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions and I told her that I was waiting for the formal letter you promised on that matter (and which is required before you file for Sanctions) before I withdraw it.
I note that I filed the Demand for Disclosure on 10 December, 2010 and as such, your responses relative thereto would be due forthwith. You may not think it matters that Jack Middleton was Judge McCafferty's boss, or that Kelly and Attorney Parent worked at the same firm, and that Judge McCafferty has ongoing contacts with members of the same firm, but I do..... and so does every single attorney I have spoken with about this matter. 
It should have been disclosed, period. And the failure to do so only adds to the appearance of partiality.
Please advise.
--
Christopher King, J.D.
http://KingCast.net -- Reel News for Real People
617.543.8085m

Thursday, December 23, 2010

KingCast laughs as Wikipedia says the Nashua Telegraph is not a good enough secondary source for Kelly Ayotte information, but the Littleton Courier is.



I'm speechless. These guys are ridiculous. They show up and trash talk me, but I'll bet you a scant few of them has ever worked for a large daily newspaper or edited a large weekly newspaper. And who the hell is this person in Manchester NH who is apparently on the Wiki Board of review? Do they have a conflict of interest? Inquiring minds want to know but the bullshit is going to stop. Other people will submit the same information and then let's see what happens. They will probably lock the forum; I'm making a YouTube video about this, so there you go. Stand by your position if that's how you're going to be, guys.


So the Nashua Telegraph isn't good enough for you? I will notify their staff immediately. But you said in another post that the Littleton Courier was good enough and the Telegraph dwarfs the Courier. And you expect the Union Leader and WMUR to run stories about this lawsuit? Please. Nor have they run any coverage of Liko Kenney's lawsuit. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan's staff is following my Tweets, unsolicited. But of course that means nothing to you either. DId the Mayor of Nashua ask what major press was covering my efforts before he and the Aldermanic Chamber presented me with a Mayoral Commendation, the closest thing Nashua has to a key to the City? Hell no. http://i45.tinypic.com/11qnzfs.jpg
So in the end, there you are waiting for the mainstream press to legitimize a story about alternative press being denied equal access. Wow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Free Press KingCast (talk • contribs) 18:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Ah, here we come to the problem. You ask above "You don't think it's newsworthy that the GOP thinks it can pick and choose what reporters to allow" -- it may very well be newsworthy, but we're not writing a newspaper, we're writing an encyclopedia, which has a whole different set of criteria for inclusion. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
It is newsworthy because it is the position of Kelly Ayotte, as Friends of Kelly Ayotte is a named Defendant, DUH. Wiki is here to note her positions on major issues, and the Free Press is a major issue the last time I checked, or are you telling me otherwise my friend? Stop the nonsense. http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2010/12/kingcast-laughs-as-wikipedia-says.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Free Press KingCast (talk • contribs) 19:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Spineless Wikipedia fokkers violate their own guidelines to censor negative Kelly Ayotte facts from First Amendment fokker KingCast.net


In this journal and over at Kelly Ayotte Wiki journal one can see that I've been having a tete-a-tete with the folks from Wikipedia regarding accurate yet politically-damaging information about a certain dirtbag U.S. Senator, that fokker and big business dupe Kelly Ayotte.

Well when you read that first linked post you can see from the screen save that Wiki gave me several guidelines about posting that I clearly followed for both of the above posts, which were stricken without comment. All I noted was the ongoing litigation and the FACT that Kelly Ayotte does not believe that all reporters should have access to her publicly-advertised rallies that occur on commercial property subject to State licensing and permitting. And I provided a reference from a daily newspaper from the second-largest or largest city in New Hampshire, as the Wiki fokkers told me to do. One day I would like to meet these fokkers in a public debate about this but that will never happen because if they're too scared to post a simple article they would never leave themselves open to a KingCast video noting their gutless nature.

You newbies take note: Three years ago then-Alderman Fred Teeboom and I won the challenge I initiated to open Nashua School Boards for public comment on personnel matters because I don't accept any bullshit from anybody, and I'm a very careful and calculating First Amendment Fokker.

Or as Kanye would say, "Let's have a toast for those douchebags."

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

KingCast sees MBF Leasing lawsuits proceeding all over the Country, but big business dupe and racist NH AG Kelly Ayotte ignored my complaints about these scumbags.

And I do mean scumbags. MBF Leasing are absolute scumbags, but I guess Kelly Ayotte didn't care about my complaint against them here as noted in the Kelly Ayotte legacy post in NH because (mutually inclusive):
1. I'm black and she is a racist.
2. The victims I tried to help are largely Indian.
3. She is a big business dupe, look at her contributors.
4. She is a big business dupe, as noted by the fact that at least one of her $10K plus contributors, Taxmasters, is being sued by the Texas AG watch the FOX News video.
Clean up Washington and back door politics, please.


And this two-bit hypocrite had the nerve to go after Paul Hodes for accepting Charlie Rangel's money, gosh she is a loathsome creature.


Final Amended Complaint of Just Film, Inc. v. MBF Leasing, Read the 29 November 2011 Decision quite favorable to Plaintiffs (link coming)  and watch this 2009 WABC video out of New York, "Class Action Anger."
Kelly Ayotte makes a horrible choice for a U.S. Senator, and her legal staff isn't pleasing me too much either, just a bunch of folks from McLane, Graf busy influence peddling with its former staff attorneys, some of whom are presiding over my Free Press/Racial lawsuit, KingCast v. Friends of Kelly Ayotte, GOP and Nashua PD NH Dist. 2010-CV-501 (Complaint + Pending Memoranda.
).
And given what I do as an online documentary film maker, I will be in touch with Just Film tomorrow. I miss the days of BW film photography.
I can't believe Kelly Ayotte is allowed to present herself as such a great family person -- look at her website picture, throwing her children into the political fray -- when her political values repeatedly lack integrity and her hatred of Free Press and Open Government is antithetical to everything we teach children in school. And she lets bad cops assault and terrorize women, even with a knife. She sucks. This post is my Holiday Gift to America, for more on Kelly run her name on my YouTube channel KingCast65.

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

KingCast set to appear on NH Capital Access TV with Denis Goddard and Lydia Harman; discussion on KingCast v. Ayotte, GOP & Nashua PD and other Civil Rights and Media matters.

I've got to finish my Memoranda Contra Motions to Dismiss and my Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions today in KingCast v. Friends of Kelly Ayotte, GOP and Nashua PD2010-CV-501 so that will be an all day project, but meanwhile I have to figure some things out. Capital Access is a high-quality show and I am thrilled to join the ranks of State Rep. Vaillancourt, Attorney Kirk Simoneau, forer U.S. Treasury wonk Bob Bestani, U.S. Senate Candidate Jim Bender, activist and videographer Carla Gericke, (remember Maryland biker Anthony Graber and gun-toting Trooper David Uhler?). If a trooper cleared leather like that on me across the dash of my Ninja he'd be facing a lawsuit I'll say that much.

And I roll video of LE all the time, here's one in Mass, they look me up and know better than to charge me with that bullshit, they've already made their run on me and lost it years ago when I was NAACP Legal Chair in Southern NH.

Anyway yah, I just got the invite, have to work on the timing as Scott Hyman's case (video) FINALLY has a hearing after he and his former neighbors prevailed to the tune of $1.7M against the Hemlock Association in Lakeville, MA after the urine, feces, busted windows and Swastikas came to town. Now the stall game comes with Motions for New Trial and JNOV, when the objection set forth by the Defense Counsel actually point to possible malpractice, if anything. If Richard Serkey didn't want testimony coming in about the Bad Acts then he should have objected but I'm 99% certain he didn't. Anyway, all dude wanted to do was build a house on a quiet island and chill, and they screwed him mercilessly, someone burned him out of his nearby home, and FOX-TV stopped covering the case, but I had a copy of their old coverage and used it with attribution, hahahahaaaa....